Competitive pressure facing Pfizer
Even though target market grows the
pharmaceutical companies face competitive pressure by losing patents and
mergers(Gibson,2002) .According
to Grim,Lee and Smith(2005),in order to understand the competitive pressure in
a industry , its important to identify industry boundaries .Therefore , Porter(1970)
the exert competitive pressure: competitive strategy will help to identify
Pfizer competitive pressure(1979).
Five Kinds of Competitive Forces
That Exert Competitive Pressure: Competitive Strategy(1979)
In a business atmosphere of an association
includes such as competitive forces
along with prospects. Therefore it is important for an organisation to evaluate
the design of the organizations concept. Michael Porter (1970)five kind of competitive
pressure can help to reduce the pressure or indicate the pressure that company
might face.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
Pfizer's merchandise can be
distributed to wholesalers, sellers, sanatoriums,
health centre, government organizations as well as pharmacies. Generally , biggest
wholesaler have a important purchaser control while purchasing production of
industry down to corporations income reliance on them. Pfizer has got US which
is largest market distributed for wholesaler, distributor and managed care
organization where 39% of the total revenue comes from in 2013 and also their
second largest market in Japan , where 10% of the total revenue come from in
2013 (Pfizer,2013).On the other hand , it seems like none of the
industry division is reliant on anyone consumer or group apart from wholesale. What's more ,
the healthcare transformation in U.S impacts the production. In 2013 the
company revenue decreased because of the purchasing the Prevener family products
and Enbrel by the Governments(Pfizer,2013).Furthermore, US healthcare
legislation has been affecting Pfizer. From 2011 the company has to pay a fee
which is not tax related each year in regarding to prescription drug sales to
specified governments programme(Pfizer,2011) and this impacted in 2011 ,$648
million deducted form the revenue(Pfizer,2013).The Governments in a straight
line bargain the values with pharmaceutical manufactures on behalf of Medicare recipients
, which kind of restricted the flexibility .However, Pfizer has got unique drug
portfolio like Liptor, Viagra,Aricept , Geodon and so on(Pfizer,2012). As a
result it gives a very subordinate control for end consumers along with
wholesale production in case of exceptional drugs for which the marketplace command
is very high.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
According to Gassman,Reepmeyer and Von
Zedtwitz(2008), In the pharmaceutical business the supplier provides raw materials,
biotechnology firms ,manufacturing plants and labour force .Also pharmaceutical
companies may have different supplier .Furthermore, it also to be noted in the
pharmaceutical industries it seems that supplier do not have strong bargaining power.
Since Pfizer is the biggest pharmaceutical corporation and it has the uppermost
purchasing capacity , therefore it gives benefit when it comes to bargain with dealers.
Even though, it depends on market condition concerning the acquisition charges
of unprocessed resources along with particularly selected undeveloped based resources
.Since the largest pharmaceutical company like Pfizer normally depends on the
supplier which are based on international marketplace charges, the volumes of buying
quantities are far above the ground. However , Pfizer will at a standstill has
a benefits when settling with providers. But , it might go to in favour of
suppliers if a perpendicular cooperation started for outsized amount of
companies(Gotham Global,2007).
Substitute products
In pharmaceutical industry , threat of
substitute products are not major but once the patents expires it
causes problem. Pfizer main product lane based on patent sheltered drugs which transports
exceptional descriptions .For example, Liptor patent protect drugs has been
unique for Pfizer for so long and it has been dominated the market(Pfizer,2013).But
the problem is Pfizer losing the patent of the cholestorel drug Liptor and
therefore the company facing the generic rivals(The New York Times,2011).Furthermore
, in emerging market where policies are not that strict , create threat of
using substitute products and as a result it lowers the sales
volume(Pfizer,2012).Furthermore, because of the expiration of Enbrel ,the
company expected to loose more money in upcoming year 2014(Pfizer,2013).Also in
upcoming year the company expected to loose some of the products in certain
countries such as Detrol La and Rapamure in U.S, Zyvox in Canada and Celebrex
in developed countries(Pfizer,2013).Although, patent protection and legal laws
strict in some countries where its hard to substitute the products , Pfizer are
more concerned about expiring and losing the patent where it will smash on the
revenue. The company has been dominated the market so long by the unique
product like Liptor and Viagra.
Existing industry rivalry
The biopharmaceutical industry is
highly competitive and highly regulated and therefore the company features a number of industry-specific tests
which can considerably blow on their outcomes. These issues consist of such as the failure or finishing of intellectual
property rights with the expiration of co-promotion plus licensing privileges,
healthcare legislation, regulatory atmosphere and pricing along with admittance
stress, pipeline efficiency and rivalry in the midst of branded products(Pfizer,2013).
The company also features tests as a result of the international financial atmosphere.
The company may be impacted by the technological advances of challengers,
competitive amalgamation goods , new commodities of participants and of course
generic competition as the company's product mature. Generally, industry
competitors challenge the current patent position. As a result, even though
Pfizer has the blockbuster like Liptors and Viagra , Astrazenca has the tipple
attraction by replacing them(FT,2014).Also there are tough competition coming
by producing similar drugs from Navatris and Eliy Lily(FT,2014) .The important
factors are that in pharmaceutical competitive market , are technological
innovation and a ability to market them perfectly. However, Pfizer managed to
market them well by creating license and joint venture. The company has done
R&D portion internally by spending $6.6m in 2013 (Pfizer,2013), in order to
expand the pipeline by seeking agreement with new companies and licensing. In
2012 the company complete alliance with Biocon Alliance to commercialised its
product and also they acquire Alacer corp for marketing and manufacturing
purpose(Pfizer,2012).Furthermore, In 2011 the company completed licensing
GMI-1070,by completing agreement with GlycoMimetics, Inc. (GlycoMimetics)(Pfizer,2011).As
the company in one of the larges biopharmaceuticals contains larger units, the most
important technique of the competition depends on the meticulous commodities(Pfizer,2012).The
other competitors find it hard to compete because of the economic scale and
product innovation .Although the company face strong completion from
Astrazeneca ,Navatris and Eli lilly (Pfizer,2011).And also if any company fine
new unique drugs that could effect the company.
Threat of new entrants
Generally , pharmaceutical industry dominate the market since it has few large
scale .Therefore , threat of entrants are comparatively low and also it is more
dependent relative on possible planned agreements along with merger linking the
companies. But it seems most of the companies merge because of the new market
or reduce the risk or taxation. And exactly Pfizer trying to merge with
Astrazeneca do the same reason, shifting the tax(CBSNews,2014). On the other
hand, Mr Wicky at Glaxo mentioned that , in terms of acquiring large portion,
it can distract the structure of the company's strategy (The Telegraph,2009).In
terms of that comments, Pfizer tried to merge with Astrazenca one of the
biggest firm in UK ,But it refused to merge with Pfizer because of its go-alone
strategy to take the drug line pipe(FT,2014).Moreover, Merging with Wyth in
2009 was a good call for Pfizer(Bloomberge Businessweek,2009) and It has been successful
by creating a broader along with more diverse portfolio and also strengthen
company's position .It also created existing and possible position in new markets.
Furthermore, the collaboration with Eli Lilly will help Pfizer to share the
costs of product development, potential revenue and product related
costs(Pfizer,2013).Also, it is important to be noted that parallel mergers
could be expected by participant s and also small scale companies could make exceptional
drugs , with the help of mergers ,they can sell in explicit market.
The Economic Environment
According to Ganguin and
Billaredelo(2005) , Pharmaceutical companies have high price bargaining power because of the
drugs which indicates strong business fundamental elements along with other
healthcare products .But on the other hand , this paradigm shifts because
economic development in certain countries. From the company prescriptive
, the consumers are facing the challenge of economic development along with
high unemployment levels(Pfizer,2013).Therefore, consumers delay their
treatment , use other drugs which is similar to Pfizer and try to avoid expensive
drugs. As a result, it effects on the revenue of the company. On the other hand
, other competitors take advantage by reducing the costs. Also the company face
pricing pressure from emerging markets and European market and also
Japan(Pfizer,2013).Moreover, government -mandated reduction prices and
government -impose accessed in some biopharmaceutical products in certain
countries put pressure on Pfizer(Pfizer,2013).
Intellectual property rights
According to Food and Drugs
Administrations(FDA),Pharmaceutical patents only last 10 years and also the
company can manufacture can produce or sell this particular product(Wikinvest,2010)
.But after the expiration , this product goes out of hand , by meaning other
competitors can produce this product and they can sell a cheaper price. As a
result ,Pfizer can have a adverse effect on revenue by losing or expiring the
intellectual property rights(Pfizer,2013).In the case of losing the patent , the
company loose those products and as a result manufactures produces similar
products and they sell those products in lower prices. The company has an
adverse effect by losing the patent of Liptor which is tope exchanging drugs
and value $12.7Bn a year on transactions(The Telegraph,2009) and
Viagra(Forbes,2014). Furthermore , the company face competitive pressure from
biosimilars.For example, the company's product such as Refacta,Enbrel,Xyntha
and the Prevner family seems like will face competitive pressure from
biosimilars(Pfizer,2013).The company's growth driven by the sales Prevener .The
company’s revenue in 2012 $51.3milliomn which down roughly13% from
2012(Forbes,2014).As a result , by losing the patent could trigger the strong
competitive pressure on Pfizer. In 2013,The company have already lost exclusive
products in certain markets and also it expected to loose some
more(Pfizer,2013).
Pfizer has been successful for so long with unique product like Liptor and Viagra .But the company is facing competitive pressure by losing the patent of Liptor and other drugs as well . After analysing Porter competitive strategy on Pfizer , it seems even though the company are some hard time , they still can come back. The company acquire and signing into new agreement and also merge with new companies .The main problem is in the pharmaceutical company is patent protection and once its expired , it is hard to compete. Because of the generic competition and the competitors like Astrazeneca and Elli Lilly find a way make unique drugs which affects Pfizer. Furthermore, Economy is also effecting the company and not to forget government policy as also putting pressure on Pfizer.
Comments
Post a Comment